How about a savings account with an interest rate of minus 4%?
Comments made
Re: How about a savings account with an interest rate of minus 4%?
Surely this will not work without a major shift in economic thinking. The new Labour approach to poverty and distribution of wealth never reached the populace at large in fact we know that the encouragement of enterprise meant that the winner took all the prizes and concentration of wealth the result.
A reversal of policies of encouragement to save must be supported with a social policy that improves the lot of the lower earners who already spend all they have. They deserve a larger share of the economic cake. A continuation of Micawberish policies of keeping the majority of the population marginally above absolute poverty is not conducive to a productive economy.
Even the Japanese would continue to resist attempts to remove their cash despite the prospects of continued poor returns!?
Re: How about a savings account with an interest rate of minus 4%?
Abolish zero coupon bearer bonds and then destroy people's savings at a rate of 4% a year? That's a vote winner.
Presumably the Japanese think that welcoming young, fertile immigrants into their economy to boost GDP while replenishing the tax base is a laughably crazy and unworkable alternative?
As Wittgenstein once said "A man will be imprisoned in a room with a door that's unlocked and opens inwards; as long as it does not occur to him to pull rather than push." Perhaps Japan should stop pushing?
Re: How about a savings account with an interest rate of minus 4%?
couldn't agree more re your comment on the need to have a very different social policy in place, my only qualification to what you wrote would be that lower earners don't just spend all they have, they also borrow to try and meet their rent , repay mortgage debt etc.
If we didn't have such an ill divided society with huge rewards available to those at the top in a position to manipulate things for their own benefit at the expense of the majority, it is quite possible we would never have had the credit crunch nor the ever increasing unemployment problem

